Submitted by Jeffrey Snider – Alhambra Investment Partners
Given all that has transpired in China this past year, year and a half it is likely that confusion will continue if only due to bias and preconceptions about “omniscience” in central banking. For my part, the PBOC has been unusually open and candid about “what” it is doing, particularly in the framework of the high degree of secrecy under which the Chinese central bank almost always operates. That it has been very public about “reform”, in contrast, is itself highly indicative of what they want to accomplish.
The less obvious and direct part is the “why.” On the surface that seems to be almost as straightforward as “reform”; in other words bubbles simply don’t work and they want to try to manage them as best they can before it gets wholly out of control and, more importantly, irreversible. That is true, but it is also a pattern that has been seen and done before, to which the Chinese are very much aware but apparently loathe (or forbidden) to directly address.
I have not written before about this element of what I see as the impetus for “reform” in China because it is mostly conjecture on my part. Here you have to engage a lot of study and put some disparate pieces together (which subjects your analysis to your own bias, which is why it’s nothing more than conjecture). Unlike the monetary policies they have engaged in 2014, the underpinnings of the philosophical shift have never, to my knowledge, been outwardly admitted by the PBOC or anyone in power. Nor do I expect them ever to do so. In that sense, this is about as close to connecting dots or reading between lines as you can get and maintain logical consistency with stated goals and activated monetary experimentation as it exists now. Continue reading
You must be logged in to post a comment.